Vol.13
No. 1, October 2003
CORRELATION
BETWEEN CHANGE IN FIXATION GRADE AND IMPROVEMENT IN VISUAL
ACUITY FOLLOWING OCCLUSION THERAPY FOR STRABISMIC AMBLYOPIA.
Dr.
Supratik Bandyopadhyay , Dr. Moheep Singh, Dr. Amod Gupta
INTRODUCTION
Amblyopia
is defined as decrease in visual acuity in one or both eyes
caused by inability to use the eye or eyes for central
fixation during critical period of visual development.
In human this period ranges from between birth to 6 years of
age. Among different causes of amblyopia strabismus is
the most common one and esotropia is more commonly associated
with amblyopia than exotropia.1 Among
different treatment modalities available conclusion of the
non-amblyopia assessment of visual acuity is difficult in
younger children. Assessment of the fixation behaviour
of an amblyopic eye gives an approximate idea about the visual
acuity in that eye2. An improvement in
the fixation pattern is considered to be an indirect evidence
of improvement in the visual acuity of the amblyopic eye.3
The present study was conducted to find out the correlation
between improvement in distant visual acuity and change in
fixation grade following occlusion therapy for strabismic
amblyopia.
Materials
and Methods
This
was a prospective study conducted in a tertiary eye care
centre in northern India. The study included 51 eyes of
51 patients of strabismic amblyopia. The patients, whose
age were between 4 to 10 years were included in the study.
The patients who had a combination of anisometropic and
strabismic amblyopia were also included in the study.
Amblyopia was defined as difference of one line or more in
Snellen visual acuity in two eyes. Anisometropia was
considered when there was 1.5 diopter or more difference in
the refractive error in two eyes. All patients underwent
cycloplegic refraction under atropine ointment 1% used twice
daily for three days. Visual acuity was assessed after
full refractive correction had been worn for atleast two
weeks. Visual acuity was assessed by Snellen's chart in
older children and with illiterate 'E' chart in a younger
individuals. Fixation pattern was graded as described by
Dale.4 Visual acuity and grade of fixation
was assessed at the initiation occlusion therapy. All
patients were given occlusion of the dominant eye for all
waking hours. The schedule of occlusion was modified
according to the age as prescribed by Dale. 4
Patients were followed up at monthly intervals for 6 months.
At each follow up visit visual acuity and fixation grade was
assessed using same set up and method.
Results
28
of 51 (54.9%) were male patients and mean age was 5.8
years. The mean log mar visual acuity at presentation
was 0.81 ( equivalent to 6/36) at 3 months follow up was
improved to 0.45. Fixation grade at presentation varied
from 5 to 10 with average of 3.13 which at 3 months improved
to 2.4 which was statistically significant. 41 patients
(80%) had one line or more improvement in distance visual
acuity whereas only 17(33%) patients had improvement in
fixation (grade out of 17 patients where there was improvement
in fixation grade 14 patients (82%) also had simultaneous
improvement in Snellen's visual acuity and in only 3 patients
(18%) fixation improved without accompanying improvement in
visual acuity.
DISCUSSION
Full
time occlusion of the normal eye has been the most widely used
modality to treatment for amblyopia and can improve the visual
acuity to 6/12 or better in 88% of amblyopic patients with
monocular fixation. We observed an improvement in
distant visual acuity in 80% of patients but at the same time
we had patients with eccentric fixation. The
assessment of fixation preference has good sensitivity for
diagnosing amblyopia of 3 lines or more in patients with
deviations greater than 10 prism diopters where as small angle
tropias have a high false positional rate with 40% of now
amblyopic patients responding with strong fixation preference.
After occlusion for amblyopia a change in fixation preference
is usually accompanied by an improvement in the visual acuity.
In the present study 82% of patients with improved fixation
grade also had improvement in visual acuity whereas 79% of
patients with no improvements in fixation grade also had
improvement in visual acuity.
CONCLUSION
There
is no statistically significant correlation between
improvement in visual acuity and change in fixation grade.
But during occlusion if one shows improvement in fixation
grade it is a strong indicator of accompanying improvement in
visual acuity.
REFERENCES
-
Oliver
M , Nawartzki I. Screening of pre-school children for
ocular anomalies (II) Amblyopia Prevalance and therapeutic
results at different ages. Br J Ophthalmol 1971; 55:
467-471.
-
Harley
Robinson D. Pediatric Ophthalmology 2nd ed W B
Saunders 1983; 338-339.
-
Lazich
B M. Amblyopia exanopsia. Arch Ophthalmol
1948; 39; 183-185.
-
Dale
RT. Fundamentals of ocular motility and strabismus.
Grune and Stratton 1982.
-
Catford
GV. Amblyopic occlusion: The results of treatment.
Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 1967; 87: 179-193.
-
Abrahmson
M, Fabian G, Sjostrand J. Refraction changes in children
developing convergent or divergent Squint. Br J
Ophthalmol 1992; 761: 723-727.
-
Brich
EE, Stager DR. Prospective assessment of acuity and
stereopsis in amblyopic infantile esotropes following
early surgery. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1990;
758-765.
Department
of Ophthalmology,
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and
Research, Chandigarh