Vol.14  No. 1,  Januray,  2004

The Role of Topical Amiloride and Flurbiprofen  in Healing and Neovascularization of Corneal Ulcers
Rajender S Chauhan, RC Nagpal, Mridul Choudhary

INTRODUCTION
Corneal ulcer is defined as discontinuity in the normal epithelial surface of the cornea associated with necrosis of the surrounding corneal tissue.  Corneal ulcer can be due to bacterial, viral, or fungal infection, concomitant with systemic, dermatological, or connective tissue disease, chemical or thermal injury, and nutritional deficiency.

Neovascularization is a common finding as a part of the healing process in the body.  The growth of capillaries into the cornea from the limbal vascular plexus is referred to as corneal neovascularization.  The conditions which can produce neovascularization are infections which may be bacterial, viral, or protozoal, and non infectious disease processes like Steven-Johnson syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, atopic keratoconjunctivitis, graft rejection, trauma, chemical burns, contact lens wear etc.

Neovascularization is an active process that is designed to heal the once avascular cornea.  It has excellent healing effect. The unfortunate aspect of this process is that the vascularization of the cornea is associated with decreased visual acuity, increased risk of graft rejection, and a greater risk of opacification from deposition of lipid.

An early step in the angiogenesis is lysis of extra cellular matrix at the edge of new vessels.  Plasminogen activators are enzymes, which by converting plasminogen to plasmin activate the proteolytic cascade that digests the extra cellular matrix. The diuretic Amiloride is a competitive inhibitor of plasminogen activator, and has been shown to inhibit corneal neovascularization and accelerate ulcer healing when given topically.  This has encouraged us to see its effect in human eyes with corneal ulcer and neovascularization.

MATERIAL AND METHODS
A double blind clinical trial was conducted in patients of bacterial corneal ulcer with neovascularization attending the OPD of the upgraded Department of Ophthalmology, Pt. B.D.Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak and then admitted in the Eye ward.

45 patients of bacterial corneal ulcer with neovascularization were divided into 3 groups by randomization, and received one of three drugs labeled A, B, or C.

Among the three drugs were topical Amiloride (1%), Flurbiprofen (0.03%), and artificial tear drops as control.

Area of corneal ulcer and neovascularization were measured on slit lamp on day 0, 7, 14, 21 and 30 days.

The size of the ulcer was determined by slit lamp biomicroscopy measurement of largest diameter and the perpendicular diameter.  The area of the ulcer was determined as: IIab/4 (Fig-1)



Area of Corneal neovascularization was measured in mm2. Maximum extent to which neovascularization reached in each pie shaped area = a in mm.

Radius of cornea = b in mm.

Radial distance of area free from neovascularization = b - a = c

Therefore area of neovascularization/6 (b2-c2) (Fig-2)

OBSERVATIONS
Table showing average rate of corneal ulcer healing and rate of regression of corneal neovascularization in groups 1, 2, and 3.

Group Avg. rate of corneal ulcer healing (mm2/day) Avt. rate of regression of corneal neovascularization (mm2/day)
Group 1 (drug A) 0.514 0.54
Group 2 (drug B) 1.71 4.9
Group 3 (drug C) 0.92 1.99

The results were anlysed by comparing drug B with drug A and C, drug C was also compared with drug A. Unpaired 't' test was used for statistical analysis and p value was found to be significant (<0.01).

Drug A was artificial tear drops, drug B was 1% amiloride, and drug C was flurbiprofen (0.03%).

In one patient of the amiloride group, there was no regression of neovascularization.

DISCUSSION
A key step in angiogenesis is production by endothelial cells of serine proteases like urokinase plasminogen activator and matrix metalloproteinases which degrade the basement membrane and permit endothelial invasion of extracellular matrix.  Since amiloride inhibits urokinase plasminogen activator and thus inhibits conversion of plasminogen to plasmin, it prevents degradation of basement membrane and extracellular matrix.  Acceleration of ulcer healing and neovascularization is explained on the basis.

Our study shows that 1% amiloride accelerates healing and regresses neovascularization in corneal ulcer patients as compared to topical 0.03% flurbiprofen and artificial tear drops.  The difference was statistically significant in both the groups.  The one patient who did not respond to amiloride therapy was one in whom the ulcer progressed very fast, leading to descemetocele formation and perforation.

CONCLUSION
1% topical amiloride accelerates healing of corneal ulcer and causes regression of neovascularization  in patients of corneal ulcer. But further studies are needed to evaluate and compare effects of various concentrations of amiloride to find out the minimum effective therapeutic concentration.  In future it may prove to be a good ulcer healing and anti-neovascularization agent.  


Address for Correspondence
Dr. R.S. Chauhan, Deptt. of Ophthalmology,
Pt. BD Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak.


  Copyright © 2004-05 North Zone Ophthalmological Society India. All rights reserved.
Powered by Indmedica.com - India's Largest Medical Portal