Indmedica Home | About Indmedica | Medical Jobs | Advertise On Indmedica
Search Indmedica Web
Indmedica - India's premier medical portal

Journal of the Anatomical Society of India

Incidence of Interparietal Bones in Adult Skulls

Author(s): Zambare, B.R.

Vol. 50, No. 1 (2001-01 - 2001-06)

Department of Anatomy, Dr. V.M. Medical College, Solapur, India

For Reprints, request the author.

Abstract

The squamous occipital bone consists of two parts supraoccipital and interparietal. Usually interparietal bone fuses withsupraoccipital but sometimes remains as separate bone. In this study total 310 adult skulls were examined to determine the incidence of theinterparietal bone. The interparietal bone was observed in 3 skulls (0.99%). Sutural bones (wormian bones named after olasus worm) wereseen in 32 skulls at lambda.

Key words : Interparietal bone, Sutural bones, Wormian bones.

Introduction :

The squamous part of occipital bone consists of supraoccipital and interparietal parts. (Shrivastava, 1977, Arinci and Elhan, 1993). Interparietal part above the highest nuchal line develops in membrane from two pairs of ossification centres. (Shrivastva, 1992). The first pair of centres consists of medial and lateral nuclei and forms two lateral plates and the second pair of centres include upper and lower nuclei and appears between two lateral plates and forms the medial plate. Failure of fusion between these centres of nuclei with each other or with supraoccipital part may give rise to interparietal bone (s). In this study the incidence of interparietal bone in the Western Maharashta region has been estimated and compared with other relevant literature.

Material and Method :

A total of 310 adult skulls (200 males & 110 females) were examined to determine the incidence of interparietal bone in Western Maharashtra Region.

Results :

Interparietal bone(s) were observed in two male skulls and one female skull (0.99%)

Skull No. 1, Skull No. 2: Both Males.

A single large triangular separate interparietal bone was seen below lambda. This resulted because of failure of fusion between upper and lower nuclei of medial plate (Fig. 1 & Fig. 2). The other ossicles seen in the lambdoid suture were sutural bones. (Wormian bones).

Skull No. 3 : Female

Two large separate interparietal bones seen on left side and right side below lambda are due to failure of fusion of left medial plate with right medial plate and left lateral plate and the other interparietal bone of right side is due to failure of fusion of right medial plate with left medial plate and right lateral plate.

Discussion :

Ranke (1913) described that there were two pairs of ossification centres at interparietal part above highest nuchal line. Sometimes a third pair of centre (Preinterparietal) is seen in addition to two pairs of centres. (Ranke, 1913, Brethnach, 1965, Shrivastava, 1977, Pal, 1984). As per Shrivastava (1977) pre-interparietal bone develops due to presence of the third pair of centres. As per Pal et al (1984) and Pal (1987) the term ‘‘Pre-interparietal’’ is misleading and bones should be referred as upper central piece or pieces of the interparietal bone. According to Shrivastava (1992) pre-interparietal bone develops as a result of failure of fusion between upper and lower nuclei of the medial plate and are actually parts of interparietal bone. He claims that all bones developing in the region of lambda and lambdoid suture outside the limits of interparietal area are sutural or wormian bones with separate ossification centres.

The incidence of interparietal bone (Table-1) was reported as 0.8% by Shrivastava (1977) 1.6% by Singh et al (1979), 2.6% by Pal et al (1984), 4.0% by Cireli et al (1985), 2.5% by Saxena et al (1986), 1.6% by Maden Muftuoglu (1990) and 6.6% by Aycan (1993). In our study the incidence of 0.99% was found.

TABLE NO. 1 INCIDENCE OF INTERPARIETAL BONE

Author Number Percentage
Shrivastava (1977) 620 0.8
Singh et al (1979) 500 1.6
Pal et al (1984) 348 2.6
Cireli et al (1985) 150 4.0
Saxena et al (1986) 40 2.5
Magden & Muftuoglu (1990) 420 1.6
Gopinathan (1992) 125 0.8
Aycan (1993) 91 6.6
Katkici & Gumusburum (1995) 302 0.99
Present Study 310 0.99

The incidence of preinterparietal bone was 2.9% by Shrivastava (1977); 0.8% by Singh et al (1979), 2.5% by Saxena et al (1986), and 0.8% by Gopinathan (1992). According to Pal et al (1984) a true pre-interparietal bone is triangular in shape and found posterior to lambda. In present study they are found only in two bones (Fig. 1) The bone which was called as pre-interparietal in previous studies is actually part of interparietal or sutural bone. The embryological development of interparietal or sutural part of occipital bone has been clarified with study published by Shrivastva (1992) similar to Pal et al (1984) and Pal (1987). The present study also suggests that the term pre-interparietal is misnomer and should not be used. Our findings in the present study are identical with Kalkici et al (1995).

References :

  1. Arinci, K. & Elhan, A: Ossa Cranii In : Anatomi I Hareket Sistemi, Ankara Universitesi, Basimevi, Ankara, p. 51. (1993)
  2. Aycan, K. (1993): Development of Interparietal bones and their variations. Erciyes Universities Saglik Billimleri Dergisis, 2: 70-76.
  3. Breathnach, A.S: Frazer’s Anatomy of the Human skeleton. In: Individual bones of skull. 6th Edn. J. & A. Churchill Ltd., London. p. 190. (1965).
  4. Cireli, E., Ustun, E.E. & Tetik, S. (1985): Os occipitale varyasyonlarive radyolojik Ozellikleri. Ege Universities Tip Faultesi Dergisi. 24: 3-35.
  5. Gopinath, K. (1992): A rare anomaly of 5 ossicles in the pre-interparietal part of the squamous occipital bone in North Indian. Journal of Anatomy 180: 201-202
  6. Katkici, U., Gumusburan, E., H. Sevim, A. and Gulec., E. (1995): A study of incidence of the interparietal bone. Journal of Anatomical Society of India. 44(1): 1-17.
  7. Magden, O. & Muftuoglu, A. (1990): Insan democraniumunda sutural ve epectal kemiklerin varyasyonlari, Istanbul Universities Cerrahpasa Tip Fakultesi Dergisi. 21: 319-323.
  8. Pal, G.P., Tamankar, B.P., Routal, R.V., Bhagwat, S.S. (1984): The ossification of the membranous part of the squamous occipital bone in man. Journal of Anatomy 138: 259-266.
  9. Pal, G.P. (1987): Variations of the interparietal bone in man. Journal of Anatomy 152: 205-208.
  10. Ranke, J. : Qain’s Element of Anatomy (Volume IV) 11th Edn. Longman Green & Co. London. pp. 53-55. (1913)
  11. Saxena, S.K., Chowdhary, D.S. & Jain, S.P. (1986): Interparietal bones in Nigerian skulls. Journal of Anatomy 144: 235-237.
  12. Singh, P.J., Gupta, C.D. & Arora, A.K. (1979): Incidence of Interparietal bones in adult skulls of Agra region. Anatomical Anzeles 145: 528-531.
  13. Shrivastva, H.C. (1977): Development of ossification centres in the squamous portion of the occipital bone in Man. Journal of Anatomy., 124: 634-649.
  14. Shrivastava, H.C. (1992): Ossification of the membranous portion of the squamous part of the occipital bone in man. Journal of Anatomy 180: 219-224.

J. Anat. Soc. India 50(1) 11-12 (2001)

Missing Image

Fig. 1 & Fig. 2 : A single seperate and triangular interparietal bone was seen below lambda as failure of fusion of upper nuclei of medial plate with lower nuclei.

Missing Image

Fig. 3 : Large separate interparietal bone seen on left side and right side below lambda.

Access free medical resources from Wiley-Blackwell now!

About Indmedica - Conditions of Usage - Advertise On Indmedica - Contact Us

Copyright © 2005 Indmedica